by The long-standing rivalry between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Baltimore Ravens reached another boiling point in their most recent clash.
What makes this Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens match player stats particularly interesting is how one-sided the final result turned out to be.
The Ravens absolutely dominated their division rivals with a decisive 28-14 victory that left Steelers fans stunned and Ravens supporters celebrating. This wasn’t just any regular-season game—it represented a significant power shift in the AFC North division standings.
The matchup featured exceptional individual performances, especially from Ravens’ running back Derrick Henry, who put on a rushing clinic against a typically strong Steelers defense.
Meanwhile, Steelers quarterback Russell Wilson showed flashes of his former self despite the loss, connecting with his receivers for some impressive plays that kept the game from becoming a complete blowout.
Both teams entered this contest with something to prove. The Ravens wanted to establish their dominance in the division, while the Steelers hoped to show they could still compete against top-tier opponents.
What unfolded was a game of stark contrasts—the Ravens’ balanced offensive attack versus the Steelers’ over-reliance on their passing game.
Steelers Vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
This comprehensive breakdown will analyze every aspect of the game, from individual player statistics to key tactical decisions that influenced the outcome.
We’ll examine how Lamar Jackson managed the game effectively, how Derrick Henry found running lanes against a normally stout Steelers front seven, and where Pittsburgh’s game plan fell short.
For football enthusiasts and casual fans alike, this detailed examination offers valuable insights into what makes these two teams tick and why their rivalry continues to be one of the most compelling in professional sports.
Final Score
The final scoreboard tells the story of a game that started slowly for the Steelers but turned into a significant victory for the Ravens. Let’s break down how the points accumulated throughout each quarter:
| Team | 1Q | 2Q | 3Q | 4Q | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steelers | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Baltimore Ravens | 7 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 28 |
As we can see from the table, the Ravens built their lead early, scoring in both the first and second quarters while holding the Steelers scoreless. The Steelers showed signs of life in the third quarter with 14 points, but the Ravens responded with 7 more of their own. The fourth quarter saw no additional scoring from either team, as the Ravens focused on clock management to secure their victory.
This quarter-by-quarter breakdown highlights how the Ravens’ early momentum proved too much for the Steelers to overcome, despite a brief resurgence in the third quarter. The scoreless first half for Pittsburgh ultimately put them in too deep a hole to climb out of.
Steelers Player Stats
Passing
The Steelers’ passing game showed moments of brilliance despite the team’s overall struggles. Here’s a breakdown of how their quarterbacks performed:
| Player | Completions/Attempts | Yards | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell Wilson | 20/29 | 270 | 2 | 0 | 121.3 |
| Justin Fields | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
Russell Wilson was the standout performer for the Steelers, completing nearly 69% of his passes for 270 yards and two touchdowns without throwing an interception. His passer rating of 121.3 indicates an efficient and effective performance, even in defeat. Wilson’s ability to avoid turnovers while still pushing the ball downfield gave the Steelers a chance to stay competitive.
Justin Fields saw limited action, attempting just one pass which fell incomplete. His brief appearance didn’t impact the game significantly, but it’s worth noting that the Steelers did try to mix things up by giving him a look.
Rushing and Receiving
The Steelers’ ground game struggled considerably against the Ravens’ stout front seven, while their receiving corps had some bright moments. Here’s the detailed breakdown:
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Rushing TDs | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Najee Harris | 6 | 17 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 0 |
| Jaylen Warren | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 0 |
| Russell Wilson | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pat Freiermuth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Darnell Washington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| George Pickens | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 87 | 1 |
| Van Jefferson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 1 |
| Mike Williams | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 37 | 0 |
| Calvin Austin III | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 0 |
The rushing statistics tell a concerning story for Pittsburgh. Najee Harris, their lead back, managed just 17 yards on 6 carries, averaging less than 3 yards per attempt. Jaylen Warren fared no better with only 6 yards on 2 carries. In total, the Steelers gained a meager 29 rushing yards across 11 attempts, highlighting a significant imbalance in their offensive approach.
In the receiving department, George Pickens emerged as Wilson’s favorite target, hauling in 5 catches for 87 yards and a touchdown. Van Jefferson made the most of his limited opportunities with 2 catches for 37 yards, including a touchdown. Mike Williams contributed with one significant catch for 37 yards, showcasing his big-play ability. The tight ends—Pat Freiermuth and Darnell Washington—combined for 4 catches but produced only 24 yards, indicating they were used primarily for short-yardage situations.
Defense
Despite the loss, several Steelers defenders put forth commendable efforts:
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Sacks | Tackles for Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elandon Roberts | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Queen | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Cameron Heyward | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Minkah Fitzpatrick | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Joey Porter Jr. | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Elandon Roberts led the team with an impressive 14 total tackles, including 7 solo stops. His active presence in the middle of the field helped limit some of the Ravens’ offensive opportunities. Patrick Queen and Cameron Heyward each contributed 10 total tackles, with Heyward adding 2 tackles for loss, demonstrating his disruptive ability at the line of scrimmage.
Safety Minkah Fitzpatrick registered 9 total tackles (5 solo), showcasing his versatility in both pass coverage and run support. Rookie cornerback Joey Porter Jr. recorded 6 tackles, all of which were solo efforts, indicating his strong tackling ability in open space.
However, the notable absence of sacks in this statistical breakdown reveals part of why the Steelers’ defense struggled to contain the Ravens’ offense. Without creating consistent pressure on Lamar Jackson, the Ravens quarterback had time to make decisions and execute plays effectively.
Kicking
| Player | Field Goals | Extra Points |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Boswell | 0/0 | 2/2 |
Kicker Chris Boswell had minimal impact on the game, attempting no field goals due to the Steelers’ offensive struggles. He did convert both extra point attempts following the team’s two touchdowns in the third quarter. The lack of field goal attempts reflects how the Steelers either couldn’t get into scoring position or were forced to go for it on fourth down when trailing by significant margins.
Punting
| Player | Punts | Yards | Inside 20 | Longest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corliss Waitman | 5 | 257 | 5 | 60 |
Punter Corliss Waitman was one of the few bright spots for the Steelers, averaging 51.4 yards per punt across 5 attempts. Most impressively, he placed all 5 of his punts inside the opponents’ 20-yard line, helping the Steelers win the field position battle even as they struggled on the scoreboard. His longest punt traveled 60 yards, demonstrating his ability to flip field position when needed.
Baltimore Ravens Player Stats
Passing
The Ravens’ passing attack was efficient and effective, even if not prolific in terms of volume:
| Player | Completions/Attempts | Yards | Touchdowns | Interceptions | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamar Jackson | 16/21 | 175 | 2 | 0 | 132 |
Lamar Jackson was the epitome of efficiency, completing 76% of his passes for 175 yards and 2 touchdowns without throwing an interception. His passer rating of 132 reflects this stellar performance. While these numbers might not jump off the page in terms of volume, they demonstrate Jackson’s ability to make the most of his passing opportunities while complementing the team’s dominant rushing attack. Jackson’s decision-making was nearly flawless, taking what the defense gave him while avoiding costly mistakes.
Rushing and Receiving
The Ravens’ ground game was the story of the day, spearheaded by an exceptional performance from their star running back:
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Rushing TDs | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Receiving TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 26 | 186 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lamar Jackson | 15 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justice Hill | 6 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 1 |
| Mark Andrews | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 0 |
| Isaiah Likely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 53 | 0 |
| Rashod Bateman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 1 |
Derrick Henry delivered a dominant performance, rushing 26 times for 186 yards (averaging 7.15 yards per carry) and 2 touchdowns. His ability to break tackles and find running lanes against a typically strong Steelers front seven was a key factor in the Ravens’ victory. Lamar Jackson complemented Henry’s power running with his own dynamic rushing ability, adding 81 yards on 15 carries. Together, Henry and Jackson accumulated a staggering 267 rushing yards, more than the Steelers’ total offensive output.
In the receiving department, tight end Isaiah Likely led the team with 3 catches for 53 yards, showcasing his ability to find openings in the middle of the field. Fellow tight end Mark Andrews added 2 receptions for 27 yards. Rashod Bateman made the most of his 2 catches, turning one into a touchdown. Running back Justice Hill served as a reliable check-down option, catching 4 passes for 13 yards and a touchdown, demonstrating the Ravens’ ability to use their backfield in the passing game.
Defense
The Ravens’ defense was stout throughout the game, with several standout performers:
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Sacks | Tackles for Loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ar’Darius Washington | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Roquan Smith | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Nnamdi Madubuike | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Marlon Humphrey | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Pierce | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Safety Ar’Darius Washington led the team with 7 total tackles (5 solo), patrolling the secondary effectively. Linebacker Roquan Smith contributed 5 tackles (3 solo), continuing to serve as the heart of the Ravens’ defense with his range and instincts.
The defensive line made its presence felt, with Nnamdi Madubuike recording 2 sacks and a tackle for loss among his 4 total tackles. Michael Pierce added another sack and tackle for loss, helping disrupt the Steelers’ passing game at critical moments. Cornerback Marlon Humphrey registered 4 tackles while providing solid coverage throughout the contest.
The 3 sacks recorded by the Ravens’ defense stands in stark contrast to the Steelers’ lack of quarterback pressure, highlighting a key difference in the game’s outcome.
Kicking
| Player | Field Goals | Extra Points |
|---|---|---|
| Justin Tucker | 0/0 | 4/4 |
Much like his counterpart, Ravens kicker Justin Tucker wasn’t called upon for field goal attempts, as the team’s offense was able to finish drives with touchdowns. Tucker was perfect on extra points, converting all 4 attempts. Despite his reputation as one of the league’s most accurate kickers, this game didn’t require him to showcase those skills beyond the routine extra points.
Punting
| Player | Punts | Yards | Inside 20 | Longest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Stout | 4 | 183 | 1 | 49 |
Punter Jordan Stout averaged 45.75 yards on his 4 punts, with his longest traveling 49 yards. He placed 1 punt inside the opponents’ 20-yard line. While these numbers aren’t as impressive as those of his Steelers counterpart, they were sufficient given the Ravens’ comfortable lead throughout most of the game. Stout’s performance helped maintain field position and didn’t allow the Steelers any significant advantages in this aspect of the game.
Game Summary & Key Highlights
The matchup between these long-time rivals provided several noteworthy moments and trends that shaped the outcome.
Here’s a detailed breakdown of the key highlights:
Ravens’ Dominant First Half
The Ravens set the tone early, establishing control in the first two quarters with a commanding 21-0 lead at halftime. This dominance was characterized by:
- Methodical ball control – The Ravens possessed the ball for over 20 minutes in the first half, wearing down the Steelers’ defense.
- Derrick Henry’s ground assault – Henry accumulated over 100 rushing yards before halftime, consistently finding running lanes against the typically stout Steelers front.
- Efficient passing from Lamar Jackson – Jackson completed 10 of 12 first-half passes, including a touchdown to Rashod Bateman that capped a 75-yard drive.
- Stifling defense – The Ravens held the Steelers to just 89 total yards in the first half, forcing three three-and-outs.
- Tactical advantage – Baltimore’s offensive coordinator mixed in play-action passes effectively off their successful running game, keeping Pittsburgh’s defense off-balance.
This first-half performance put the Steelers in a significant hole that proved too deep to overcome, despite their improved play after halftime.
Steelers’ Comeback Attempt
Pittsburgh showed resilience in the third quarter, briefly giving their fans hope with a spirited comeback attempt:
- Wilson’s precision passing – Russell Wilson connected on 8 consecutive passes during a stretch in the third quarter, demonstrating his veteran poise.
- Explosive plays – The 37-yard touchdown strike to Van Jefferson and a 29-yard completion to George Pickens highlighted Pittsburgh’s big-play capability.
- Defensive adjustments – The Steelers’ defense forced a three-and-out on the Ravens’ first possession of the second half, creating momentum.
- Two quick scores – Pittsburgh managed to put up 14 points in a span of just over six minutes, cutting the deficit to 21-14.
- Increased tempo – The Steelers’ no-huddle approach caught the Ravens’ defense off guard initially, creating favorable matchups.
However, this resurgence proved short-lived as the Ravens reasserted control with their next possession.
Derrick Henry’s Special Night
The Ravens’ star running back put on a performance that will be remembered in this rivalry’s history:
- Punishing running style – Henry consistently broke first-contact tackles, gaining valuable extra yards after initial hits.
- Big-play ability – His 42-yard touchdown run in the second quarter showcased his combination of speed and power.
- Workhouse mentality – With 26 carries, Henry demonstrated his durability and ability to handle a heavy workload.
- Game management role – In the fourth quarter, Henry helped the Ravens control the clock, carrying the ball 10 times to wear down the defense and preserve the lead.
- Historical context – This 186-yard performance ranks among the best by any running back against the historically strong Steelers rush defense.
Henry’s dominance on the ground allowed the Ravens to dictate the game’s pace and limited the Steelers’ offensive opportunities by keeping their defense on the field for extended periods.
Defensive Standouts
Several defensive players made significant impacts beyond what the basic statistics might indicate:
- Nnamdi Madubuike’s timely pressure – Both of his sacks came on third downs, ending Steelers’ drives at crucial moments.
- Roquan Smith’s leadership – Beyond his 5 tackles, Smith’s pre-snap adjustments helped the Ravens’ defense anticipate several Steelers’ plays.
- Elandon Roberts’ futile effort – Despite his team-leading 14 tackles, the Steelers linebacker was often making stops downfield after significant gains.
- Secondary coverage battles – Marlon Humphrey largely neutralized George Pickens except for one touchdown drive, forcing Wilson to look elsewhere.
- Michael Pierce’s interior presence – His disruption in the middle limited the Steelers’ already struggling run game to just 2.6 yards per carry.
These individual defensive performances on both sides created an intriguing chess match within the larger context of the game.
Offensive Contrasts
The game highlighted stark differences in offensive approaches:
- Baltimore’s balanced attack – The Ravens accumulated 267 rushing yards and 175 passing yards, keeping the Steelers’ defense guessing.
- Pittsburgh’s one-dimensional game plan – With just 29 rushing yards compared to 270 passing yards, the Steelers became predictable in critical situations.
- Red zone efficiency – The Ravens scored touchdowns on 3 of their 4 red zone trips, while the Steelers went 2-for-3.
- Third-down conversion rates – Baltimore converted 8 of 12 third downs (67%), while Pittsburgh managed just 5 of 13 (38%).
- Time of possession advantage – The Ravens controlled the ball for nearly 38 minutes compared to the Steelers’ 22 minutes, limiting Pittsburgh’s opportunities.
These contrasting approaches underscored why the Ravens were able to maintain control throughout most of the contest despite the Steelers’ brief resurgence.
FAQs on Steelers Vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats:
Who was the standout player of the match?
Derrick Henry was undoubtedly the standout performer, rushing for 186 yards and 2 touchdowns on 26 carries. His dominant physical running style proved too much for the Steelers’ defense to handle, as he averaged an impressive 7.15 yards per attempt. Henry’s ability to break tackles and find running lanes consistently allowed the Ravens to control the game’s tempo and build their commanding lead. His performance ranks among the best individual rushing efforts in recent Ravens-Steelers matchups and was instrumental in Baltimore’s convincing victory.
How did the Steelers perform in the passing game?
Despite the loss, the Steelers’ passing game showed notable efficiency and effectiveness. Russell Wilson completed 20 of 29 passes (69%) for 270 yards and 2 touchdowns without throwing an interception, earning an impressive 121.3 passer rating. George Pickens was his favorite target, catching 5 passes for 87 yards and a touchdown, while Van Jefferson added another scoring reception among his 2 catches for 37 yards. However, this aerial success was undermined by a complete lack of balance, as the team managed just 29 rushing yards total. This one-dimensionality made the Steelers predictable in key situations and ultimately prevented them from mounting a successful comeback despite Wilson’s strong performance.
What were the key statistics that determined the outcome of the game?
Several statistical disparities highlight why the Ravens emerged victorious:
- Rushing yards: Ravens 267, Steelers 29 – This massive 238-yard differential allowed Baltimore to control the clock and wear down Pittsburgh’s defense.
- Time of possession: Ravens 37:52, Steelers 22:08 – Baltimore’s ability to sustain drives limited Pittsburgh’s offensive opportunities.
- Third-down efficiency: Ravens 67% (8/12), Steelers 38% (5/13) – The Ravens’ success in converting third downs helped them maintain drives and build their lead.
- Sacks: Ravens 3, Steelers 0 – Baltimore’s pass rush created pressure on Wilson at key moments, while Jackson had time to operate effectively.
- Yards per play: Ravens 6.1, Steelers 5.2 – Baltimore’s greater efficiency per play accumulated throughout the game, particularly in the running game.
What adjustments did the Steelers make at halftime?
After a scoreless first half, the Steelers implemented several effective adjustments:
- Increased tempo with more no-huddle offense to prevent the Ravens from substituting defensive personnel.
- More target distribution to receivers beyond George Pickens, getting Van Jefferson, Mike Williams, and others involved.
- Defensive alignment shifts to better contain Lamar Jackson’s scrambling ability, using more spy techniques.
- Blitz packages that were more disguised, creating occasional pressure that wasn’t present in the first half.
- More aggressive downfield passing, with Wilson taking calculated shots instead of settling for shorter completions.
These changes helped Pittsburgh score 14 third-quarter points, but ultimately weren’t enough to overcome Baltimore’s lead and counter-adjustments.
How did this game impact the AFC North standings?
This victory strengthened the Ravens’ position in the AFC North division, giving them a crucial head-to-head advantage over the Steelers. With divisional records often serving as important tiebreakers for playoff seeding, Baltimore’s dominant performance sends a message to not only Pittsburgh but also Cincinnati and Cleveland about their championship aspirations. For the Steelers, this loss creates greater pressure to perform well in their remaining divisional matchups and against common opponents to maintain realistic playoff hopes. The comprehensive nature of the defeat also damages their conference record, which could become relevant in wild card tiebreaker scenarios later in the season.
What does this performance indicate about Lamar Jackson’s development as a passer?
While Jackson’s raw passing numbers (16/21, 175 yards, 2 TDs) might not appear extraordinary at first glance, they demonstrate his continued evolution as a complete quarterback. His 76% completion percentage and 132 passer rating highlight his improved accuracy and decision-making. Most impressively, Jackson showed patience and discipline by not forcing throws when the running game was working effectively. He recognized favorable matchups in the red zone for both of his touchdown passes and avoided risky throws that could have given Pittsburgh momentum. This performance reinforces that Jackson has developed into a quarterback who can win games through the air when necessary, while understanding when to let the running game (including his own rushing ability) serve as the primary offensive weapon.
Also Check:
- Minnesota Vikings Vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats
- Dallas Cowboys Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
- Washington Commanders Vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
Conclusion:
This matchup between the Baltimore Ravens and the Pittsburgh Steelers served as a microcosm of where both franchises currently stand. The Ravens demonstrated their championship aspirations with a complete team performance that featured overwhelming rushing dominance, timely passing, and sturdy defense. Meanwhile, the Steelers showed flashes of potential but revealed concerning weaknesses in their rushing attack and run defense that must be addressed if they hope to contend in the competitive AFC North.
Derrick Henry’s exceptional performance highlighted the Ravens’ offseason acquisition strategy, proving that their investment in the former Titans star is paying significant dividends. His ability to control the game’s tempo complements Lamar Jackson’s dynamic skill set perfectly, giving Baltimore one of the league’s most versatile and dangerous offenses.
For Pittsburgh, Russell Wilson’s efficient passing performance provides a silver lining amid an otherwise disappointing outing. His connection with George Pickens shows promise for future development, but the team’s inability to establish any semblance of a running game raises serious concerns about offensive balance going forward.
The rivalry between these two franchises continues to evolve, with Baltimore currently holding the upper hand. However, history suggests that Pittsburgh will make adjustments and that future matchups will likely be more competitive. The 28-14 final score will serve as motivation for the Steelers and a confidence booster for the Ravens as both teams continue their respective journeys through the season.
As this chapter in the storied Ravens-Steelers rivalry comes to a close, it reinforces what makes this matchup so compelling—the contrast in styles, the physical nature of play, and the lasting implications for division standings. Football fans can only hope that the next installment delivers similar intensity and drama, albeit perhaps with a more balanced outcome.
